Search for: All records

Abstract Anthropogenic salinization resulting from road salt application can degrade aquatic environments by altering the structure and function of phytoplankton communities, ultimately reducing flows of resources through aquatic food webs. However, physiological mechanisms underlying taxon‐specific responses to salinization are often poorly linked to higher‐order ecosystem dynamics, limiting our ability to predict community responses to salinization. To this end, we tested hypotheses derived from Subsidy‐Stress and Ecological Stoichiometry theory by growing two cosmopolitan genera,Dolichospermum(prokaryotic, cyanobacteria) andScenedesmus(eukaryotic, green algae), across NaCl gradients and contrasting differences in their growth rates, degree of Na homeostasis, and cellular C : N : P ratios. We found mixed support for the subsidy‐stress hypothesis, with only stress responses observed for both species. Instead, growth declines appeared to be linked to stoichiometric tradeoffs between growth and homeostatic regulation, with stronger homeostatic Na regulation coinciding with a greater reduction inScenedesmusgrowth rates and higher variation in their stoichiometric C : N : P ratios across NaCl gradients. Nonhomeostatic Na regulation allowedDolichospermumto sustain higher growth rates, which appeared to constrain variation in their stoichiometric C : N : P ratios along with their stronger physiological regulation of intracellular P storage molecule production. Differences in phytoplankton growth responses were consistent with stoichiometric theory and field observations documenting shifts from green algae to cyanobacteria in response to freshwater salinization. Our results suggest that these shifts could take place below existing North American chronic threshold limits, resulting in decreased production at higher trophic levels by reducing phytoplankton biomass production rates and inducing nutritional stress in consumers. 

Growth is a function of the net accrual of resources by an organism. Energy and elemental contents of organisms are dynamically linked through their uptake and allocation to biomass production, yet we lack a full understanding of how these dynamics regulate growth rate. Here, we develop a multivariate imbalance framework, the growth efficiency hypothesis, linking organismal resource contents to growth and metabolic use efficiencies, and demonstrate its effectiveness in predicting consumer growth rates under elemental and food quantity limitation. The relative proportions of carbon (%C), nitrogen (%N), phosphorus (%P), and adenosine triphosphate (%ATP) in consumers differed markedly across resource limitation treatments. Differences in their resource composition were linked to systematic changes in stoichiometric use efficiencies, which served to maintain relatively consistent relationships between elemental and ATP content in consumer tissues and optimize biomass production. Overall, these adjustments were quantitatively linked to growth, enabling highly accurate predictions of consumer growth rates.